System Design Hard system-design 1 views 1 min read

Explain caching strategies and common failure modes.

Peer-reviewed by HireXTech Technical Panel Updated for 2025/2026 hiring Editorial standards
Practise this track
Interviewer Expectations for this Question
01
Core Competency

Assesses fundamental understanding of System Design conventions, runtime behavior, and memory/performance considerations.

02
Evaluation Criteria

Hiring managers look for precision, avoidance of ambiguous jargon, and ability to explain trade-offs under real production conditions.

Comprehensive Model Answer Verified Solution

Strategies:

  • Cache-aside (lazy loading): app checks cache, on miss reads DB and populates. Most common.
  • Read-through: cache library fetches on miss.
  • Write-through: write to cache and DB together for consistency.
  • Write-behind: write to cache, flush to DB asynchronously for throughput with some durability risk.

Eviction: LRU/LFU/TTL. Place caches at multiple layers: client, CDN, application (Redis/Memcached), and database.

Failure modes:

  • Stampede/thundering herd: many requests miss the same key; use locks, single-flight or jittered TTLs.
  • Cache penetration: repeated misses for non-existent keys; cache negatives or use a bloom filter.
  • Stale data: invalidation is hard; set TTLs, publish invalidation events, or version keys.
  • Hot key overload: shard or replicate the key.

Candidate Response Strategy & Interview Tips

  1. Start with a concise one-sentence summary: Deliver a direct, confident answer first before expanding into nuances.
  2. Demonstrate real-world trade-offs: Discuss where this approach excels and when you would avoid it in production systems.
  3. Discuss complexity & edge cases: Proactively explain time/space complexity or boundary conditions (null values, scale limits).
  4. Prepare for interviewer follow-ups: Technical hiring panels frequently probe deeper into concurrency, backward compatibility, or alternative libraries.
Related Topics & Skills
Spotted an error or have an alternative solution?